- Reduced connectivity costs. Leveraging existing IP infrastructure and commodity NICs will definitely reduce costs as compared to Fibre Channel storage area networds. Fibre Channel HBAs still hover around $1k each, and SAN port costs are about the same. Don't forget nearly $250 per FC cable and you're up to $2,250 per node on the SAN. If your $1,500 blade server is dual connected to the SAN, you just spent 3x what the server was worth on connectivity. Compare that to almost free via iSCSI and you have a bargain.
- Reduced manpower costs. Everybody has an existing network infrastructure. As a result, everybody has a network administrator. Don't expect the network admin to belly up the FC SAN and work wonders overnight. It takes special training and experience to make a iSCSI SAN storage system sing.
Dig Deeper on Primary and secondary storage
Related Q&A from Brian Peterson
Responsible data management means keeping important on file while deleting obsolete information. Continue Reading
Streamlining data storage management through retention policies can ease the burden of regulation compliance and data management. Continue Reading
Assessing Fibre Channel (FC) versus iSCSI benefits depends on storage capacity. Read expert Brain Peterson's advice on deciding when a switch is ... Continue Reading