Hyper-V R2 SP1 changes the virtualization market

VMware has been dominating the virtualization market since virtualization hit the data center. Other hypervisors have been trying to change that, but to no avail. Until now. New features in Microsoft’s Hyper-V R2 SP1 look like it might change the virtualization landscape by giving Microsoft server shops a cheaper option with comparable capabilities.

Hyper-V 2008 R2 SP1’s new features

With the release of the latest

    Requires Free Membership to View

Hyper-V version in Windows 2008 R2 SP1, some important new features have been added that make the hypervisor more attractive to shops that formerly would have only considered VMware. The most important facet is live migration. You can now move a virtual machine (VM) from one Hyper-V host to another host while keeping it live. The absence of this feature was an important reason some companies previously did not use Hyper-V.

More on Hyper-V R2 SP1

How Hyper-V Dynamic Memory virtual memory allocation works

Best practices for Dynamic Memory in Hyper-V R2

Podcast: Hyper-V versus VMware evolves with new releases


Another new feature in Hyper-V is Dynamic Memory. With this, VMs don’t use a fixed amount of memory, but instead use dynamic memory assignment. This allows more flexibility in the total amount of available memory on your server. Virtual Machine Snapshot allows administrators to take a snapshot before making important modifications on a virtual machine.

VMware sites not swayed by Hyper-V

Most enterprises have a virtualization solution, which encompasses much more than just a couple of hypervisor hosts. For those companies with a VMware-based infrastructure in place, Hyper-V is not likely to be attractive, as the Microsoft offering isn't as complete as the VMware offering.

Hyper-V most attractive to new virtualization customers

Another part of the market consists of new virtualization customers. For these, Hyper-V is an option they can use without much hassle. Hyper-V is included in Windows Server 2008 R2, so it’s already in place for customers using Windows in their network, which makes it easy for administrators to integrate Microsoft servers such as Exchange and MS SQL into the Hyper-V environment.

Even for environments that don't have many Windows servers in their network, Hyper-V is an interesting option to consider. The free version of Hyper-V contains advanced features such as live migration and high availability (HA). In contrast, companies that start with the free VMware version and later want to add functionality such as HA and live migration, can only do that by buying expensive additional licensing.

Hyper-V vs. VMware tests inconclusive

The latest version of Hyper-V and VMware’s product offer comparable features, but VMware is more sophisticated. VMware offers smarter memory management and that makes it more efficient in handling VMs that run different operating systems. For Windows-only environments, this argument isn't that important, as Hyper-V is tuned to run Windows servers in the best possible way.

VMware says vSphere performance is still superior (PDF). A performance test running 30 virtual machines on a VMware vSphere 5 machine and the 30 VMs on Microsoft Hyper-V R2 SP1 was conducted, and according to VMware, vSphere outperforms Hyper-V by 18.9%. But does that mean that VMware is the winner? Probably not.

If you search for reports about which virtualization solution is fastest, you'll find some that indicate that, given the test method they've used, VMware is faster; others indicate that Hyper-V is faster. And it might happen that if you compare them yourself, you'll have different findings. Comparing speed isn't really going to help you find the best solution for your customers, for whom the most important question is whether or not the solution best fits their environment.

If multiple operating systems are used on the hypervisor, customers can benefit from the better memory management models that VMware has developed to run these OSes in the most efficient way. For those that don't have any virtualization at all yet, and especially those that are using Windows servers on a large scale already, Hyper-V seems to be the more obvious choice. Even if a customer doesn't have a large Windows install base yet, Hyper-V offers a better starter package, and that means that customers get more value for their money.

About the author:
Sander van Vugt is an author and independent technical trainer, specializing in Linux since 1994. Van Vugt is also a technical consultant for high-availability (HA) clustering and performance optimization, as well as an expert on SLED 10 administration.

This was first published in March 2012

There are Comments. Add yours.

TIP: Want to include a code block in your comment? Use <pre> or <code> tags around the desired text. Ex: <code>insert code</code>

REGISTER or login:

Forgot Password?
By submitting you agree to receive email from TechTarget and its partners. If you reside outside of the United States, you consent to having your personal data transferred to and processed in the United States. Privacy
Sort by: OldestNewest

Forgot Password?

No problem! Submit your e-mail address below. We'll send you an email containing your password.

Your password has been sent to:

Disclaimer: Our Tips Exchange is a forum for you to share technical advice and expertise with your peers and to learn from other enterprise IT professionals. TechTarget provides the infrastructure to facilitate this sharing of information. However, we cannot guarantee the accuracy or validity of the material submitted. You agree that your use of the Ask The Expert services and your reliance on any questions, answers, information or other materials received through this Web site is at your own risk.