Question: What did the study look at?
By submitting your email address, you agree to receive emails regarding relevant topic offers from TechTarget and its partners. You can withdraw your consent at any time. Contact TechTarget at 275 Grove Street, Newton, MA.
Winthrop: The impetus for this research was to get a better sense of the pressures driving mobile VoIP technology. Our initial hypothesis was based on the fact that organizations were looking to reduce cellular costs.
Question: What did you find?
Winthrop: The data showed something very different. At first, companies were planning on deploying mobile VoIP to cut cellular costs. That was the original intention. What they realized — particularly with best-in-class organizations — was that the actual benefit was not [totally] in cost reductions but in improved productivity. It is more about productivity gains. The cellular saving gains were there, but that wasn't number one. [Overall], the annual cost savings was over $150 per user.
Question: What role, specifically, did cellular costs play?
Winthrop: We did not ask discretely about cellular costs. You can infer a big component of [the savings] is the cellular costs. It's actually quite simple when you think about it. You can take a Wi-Fi phone that is connected to the PBX system and roam around the office and corporate campus and always be available. So that is a tremendous productivity gain. It's a minute here, a minute there. Those kinds of gains overall translate into tremendous value to the organization. If you step away for two minutes to get coffee, you could miss that all-important call. Now with a mobile VoIP phone, you won't miss it.
Question: So aren't you measuring two different things: Subjective productivity and cellular savings, which is more definitive? Can't you do a more precise measure of savings from switching from cellular to FMC?
Winthrop: It's hard to make a one-to-one correlation [on cellular minutes saved] unless dual-mode devices are used. It's not a black or white issue. Not all organizations surveyed had dual-mode Wi-Fi and cellular phones. True FMC comes from those phones. They hand calls between the corporate Wi-Fi and the cellular network. That's true FMC. Not all organizations have taken it to that level. Right now, there are a number of organizations that are using mobile voice over Wi-Fi. That's where it's hard to map the correlation between cellular and productivity gains.
Question: So you are saying that unless the switching is totally agile, you can't measure ROI any more precisely than when assessing productivity gains. The key, it seems, is true FMC.
Winthrop: There's no doubt that the future holds great promise for devices that can do seamless handoffs.
Question: After the fact that productivity turned out to be more of a driver than reduced costs, did anything else about the survey surprise you?
Winthrop: The second thing that was very surprising was the level of dissatisfaction with the voice over Wi-Fi networks that exist right now. Now, only 47% of organizations rated mobile VoIP solutions as high or very high. That is not the fault of manufacturers or the fault of end-user organizations. No one is to blame. It tells me more planning is needed before the networks are put in place to ensure the Wi-Fi network is robust enough to handle voice and data at the same time.
Question: The survey focused on best-in-class organizations. What counsel does this provide to other companies that, perhaps, aren't as advanced?
Winthrop: That they must do a lot more planning up front. The second recommendation in the report is to make sure the Wi-Fi network can handle the traffic and fulfill bandwidth needs.
This Executive Briefing originally appeared in a weekly report from IT Business Edge.