Channel Strategies for the CIOQ: What determines the choice of RAID configuration?
 |
||||
|
|
|||
|
||||
There are three criteria to consider here: performance, reliability/availability and cost. If raw performance is the only concern your customer has and your array supports RAID 1 and 0, then that coupled with 15,000 RPM drives is the way you want to go. However, expect the price tag to be high for this solution. For normal workloads, RAID 5 with 10,000 RPM drives should be sufficient.
Just make sure that you have put in enough spindles to handle the customer's workload, and validate with vendor sizing tools to ensure there are no gotchas after implementation. If you're taking the "cheap disk" approach (that means SATA), then you absolutely want a solution that can handle RAID 6, or something RAID-6-like with a dual-parity scheme to protect from double-disk failures. SATA drives are less reliable than FC drives and are also typically quite a bit bigger. This means that rebuild times will be significantly longer for a 750GB drive than it is for a 146GB drive in a similarly sized RAID group. Since rebuild times are longer, it means you are susceptible to a parity error or a second drive failure that can bring a system down. RAID 6 protects your customer from this issue. The trade-off is that there is additional overhead from the second parity calculation, so you want to take this into account when sizing the solution.
Return to the storage capacity assessment FAQ guide and read the rest of Kurtis' expert responses.
This was first published in January 2008
Join the conversationComment
Share
Comments
Results
Contribute to the conversation